I'm Not A Robot Download Torrent

When I was growing up, one of my favourite authors was Isaac Asimov. Iloved his books and his ideas about robots. The man was a genius in theway he wrote, he invented the three laws of Robotics, as the verybeginning of the movie tells us, they are: 1) A robot can never harm ahuman. 2) A robot must obey all human orders unless it conflicts withthe first law. 3) A robot must protect itself unless it conflicts withthe first two laws.Because of this and because of the fact that I knew Will Smith was theleading actor in this movie I went into this movie with loweredexpectations. I expected to see a corny movie full of explosions andkiller robots. I did get that, or at least the explosions part, but imagine mysurprise when the movie ended up exceeding my expectations and more.Even though during the ending credits it says that the movie wassuggested by the books by Isaac Asimov most of the movie seemed to playquite well with Isaac Asimov's ideas about robots. The movie playedwith concepts that Isaac Asimov played with, if the three laws can bemade, they can be broken. And it was an Asimov-ish 'whodunit' as well. Will Smith managed to pull off a stunning performance as 'Del Spooner',a Chicago detective that is suspicious of robots and is againsttechnology. His acting is much more like his acting in 'Enemy of theState' than his performances in his other two Science Fiction flicks,'Independence Day' and 'Men in Black'. He is a believable character,one that you end up sympathising with as you learn why, exactly, hehates robots so much.A highly critiqued point usually comes from the fans of the book inthat Bridget Moynahan plays Susan Calvin. It is true that Moynahan asCalvin is much younger than the Isaac Asimov version, but beyond that Ifound her to be a pleasant surprise as well. She plays her persona verywell, delivering a wooden, robot-like performance. She is obvious inthe fact that she likes robots much more than humans, and her dislikeof Spooner is amusing. Over the course of the movie she thaws a little,but not an incredible lot. I find her to be a believable character. The pure stroke of genius in this movie is the robot, Sonny, who atfirst reminds one of Data from Star Trek. His character evolves overthe course of the story, and Alex Proyas does a good job at keeping usguessing at whether the emotional robot is a 'good guy' or not. This movie, which I've now seen twice, has been raked over the coals soto speak in the realm of artistic licence, but I felt that IsaacAsimov, if he were here, would have been rather pleased with thismovie. The only two points of conflict, perhaps, would be the amount ofviolence against actual robots in the story (he was never that violentin his short stories/books) and the very typical Hollywood blow'emupclimax, which, yes, smacked heavily of Terminator for a while there.The ending, I felt, repaired and wrapped up nicely, making up forwhatever excessive action went on before it.Two notes about the cinematography in this movie, first of all, theMatrix scene was not necessary. A character was being chased and did aTrinity pause in mid-air pose, which pulled me out of the movie for acouple seconds. Luckily it wasn't too hard to get back into the movie.Second note was something that I felt was very innovative on the partof Alex Proyas, which was the 'camera moving with moving object' shots.I noticed at least three of them in the movie. Very nice film workthere. I'm sure it will get horribly overdone in the next few years,but for now it is nice. The CGI also gets honourable mention for makingthe robots meld so well with their surroundings. Finally CGI hasreached a point where they don't seem fake, even for a moment. In regards to nudity in the movie.. I've read a couple of reviewswhich notice the Moynahan nude in fogged up shower scene, and forget tonotice the Will Smith completely nude with no fog shower scene. I mustsay, as a female viewer it is nice to get the generous end of the stickwhen it comes to seeing something as, dare I say appealing? as WillSmith's very nicely developed body. Lastly and in a point that has nothing to do with the movie and more todo with questions brought up by it-- It took until a day later andthinking about the movie some more that I realized that 'I, Robot' wasalso very socially different. As in two of the main characters,including the hero are black males, one woman, and one (male) robot. Ididn't find this odd at all in watching it, perhaps because Will Smithis such a recognisable character, but after thinking about it, I feltthat this is a very positive sign. It shows, to me, that society ischanging. I feel that I wouldn't have been able to see that, even 10-15years ago and thought nothing of it. I've noticed this before though..that the most gender/social equal views seem to come from sciencefiction in our media.. it is interesting.Now, of course the movie does bring up some ethical questions like ifit's all right to make a servant/slave class out of robots, etc., butall in all I really liked this movie. Any movie that makes you think isa good movie, any movie that gives you fun, drama, action, mystery, andmakes you think is a great movie. Thank goodness I, Robot is all of theabove.